Ratings & Reviews
I am a trial attorney who had been practicing law for ten years. Attorneys only hire the best when the things that matter the most in their own lives are threatened with harm. That is why I hired Christopher R. Largey of Largey Law when my ...
I am a trial attorney who had been practicing law for ten years. Attorneys only hire the best when the things that matter the most in their own lives are threatened with harm. That is why I hired Christopher R. Largey of Largey Law when my family, children, and career were maliciously attacked and deceitfully threatened. Mr. Largey is respected by our judges, other attorneys, and the community at large, and as a result he is routinely hired by lawyers who need to be represented fully. He never backs down, he is never pushed, and he is compassionate. He absolutely understood the gravity of the family dynamic that he had to protect in my case. Whenever a lie was told, he would immediately and aggressively confront it head-on, exposing the same. His skillful use of courtroom practice and his knowledge of the evidence code brought the truth to light. The result was a resounding legal victory that protected my children, as well as the complete vindication of my character and my career. Though Chris is not even a family law lawyer, I knew he was the right attorney for this challenge. He stood there for me, and I will never regret hiring him for as long as I live.
Following my car accident I was referred by a friend to Largey Law Firm. Chris Largey agreed to take my case. He and Rosie along with his staff were very reassuring that they would take care if all my legal issues dealing with the insuran...
Following my car accident I was referred by a friend to Largey Law Firm. Chris Largey agreed to take my case. He and Rosie along with his staff were very reassuring that they would take care if all my legal issues dealing with the insurance companies. He was not only concerned about my case but also about my physical condition. Chris referred me to health care workers that were a great asset to my healing process. Chris handled everything for me which allowed me to concentrate on healing. I would highly recommend the Largey Law Firm to anyone who needs someone to get justice for them.
As a family law attorney, I had the opportunity to work with Chris in a case involving an injunction that was part of a family law matter that I was involved in. I wholeheartedly recommend him as a criminal law attorney. In my opinion, he ...
As a family law attorney, I had the opportunity to work with Chris in a case involving an injunction that was part of a family law matter that I was involved in. I wholeheartedly recommend him as a criminal law attorney. In my opinion, he is one of the best I have ever had the pleasure of working with!
Informative friendly and helpful professional. Passionate and caring for the right of the person represented.
Florida Supreme Court Overturns Controversial Ruling on Expert Witnesses
- posted: Jan. 15, 2020
In a 4 to 3 decision, justices with the Florida Supreme Court struck down a 2013 law that changed the state’s standard for determining whether or not certain expert witnesses can be used during trials. The ruling, which found the earlier law unconstitutional, is relevant for people involved in civil and criminal trials alike, as expert witnesses are regularly used by plaintiffs, defendants and prosecutors to shed light on evidence during cases ranging from medical malpractice to financial crimes to homicide.
In practical terms, the state Supreme Court’s decision means that going forward, to evaluate the legitimacy of expert testimony, the “Frye” standard of evidence will apply rather than the “Daubert” standard. The Daubert standard is used at the federal level, and most states have also stopped using the previously common Frye standard in order to adopt the Daubert standard – which is what the Florida legislature did in 2013. At the time, business groups supported the law but plaintiffs’ attorneys opposed it on the grounds it would make cases more time-consuming and expensive for clients.
Under the Frye standard, a court decides whether or not expert testimony is admissible for a trial by determining if the procedures, techniques or principles used by the witness are generally accepted by other experts in the field. The Daubert standard, on the other hand, is a test that judges use to weigh if expert testimony actually consists of helpful scientific or technical information or other specialized knowledge. One party can ask a judge to evaluate expert testimony using the Daubert standard if they believe the other party is trying to build a case by using “junk science.”
The majority decision in the Florida Supreme Court was based on the four justices’ assertion that the 2013 law violated the constitutional separation of powers, since it is the court rather than the legislature that has the authority to determine court-system procedures. The three dissenting justices strongly opposed the decision on the grounds that since the issue of the evidence admissibility standard had not been disagreed upon in the lower courts, the legal basis did not exist for the Florida Supreme Court to rule on it.
Ultimately, the Frye standard may make it easier for people to pursue legal action in civil cases to right the wrongs they have experienced, as the use of the Frye standard is generally more cost-effective.
The attorneys at Largey Law are skilled at securing reliable, qualified expert witnesses to help build strong cases in wrongful death lawsuits, personal injury actions and criminal trials. To schedule a free initial consultation with an experienced lawyer, call us at 352-253-0456 or contact us online. We have offices in Tavares, Clermont and Inverness.